Skip to content
All fields

03 · MACHINES

Make the next machine action understandable.

Explore interfaces that connect an operator’s question to drawings, equipment state, and a proposed action. Use voice and visual context to explain the work, with explicit approval and independent safety controls.
An engineer reviewing a robotic machine in an industrial workshop

What the interaction connects to.

Start with the person, their task, and the moment they need help. These planned application areas depend on validated integrations and clear human control.

Context behind the interface

Inference, machine records, approved drawings, telemetry, tool execution, and operational history.

Connect deliberately

Equipment interfaces and facility systems within approved network zones. Control capabilities depend on the machine and its operating procedures.

Keep human authority

Operators set limits and release permitted actions. Machine safety, emergency stops, and real-time control remain with the appropriate equipment systems.

ILLUSTRATIVE OUTCOME

A completed machine operation whose command, authority, sensor evidence, intervention, and result can be traced to one continuing record.

INTERACTIVE SIMULATION

Physical action inside a visible boundary.

Release one bounded movement, observe its live state, and retain the command and result in the same record.
MACHINE WORK · SIMULATED CELL M-14

Inspection transfer

Move carrier 02 from Station 2 to Station 3, then stop.

A human working beside connected industrial equipment
HeldMC-02 · simulated governed edge link
VELOCITY0.00 m/s
TORQUE2.1 Nm
VIBRATION0.08 mm/s
CLEARANCE142 mm

Station 20%Station 3

BOUNDED OPERATION

One route. One payload. One stop.

  • Speed limited to 0.18 m/s
  • Safety zone A3 remains locked
  • No autonomous route changes
  • Release expires after completion
PHYSICAL APPROVALRelease this movement once

The agent has prepared the operation. A human must authorize its physical effect.

EVENT RECORD Streaming
Agent

Inspection route prepared inside Cell M-14.

Machine

Interlocks, clearance, and payload verified.

BUILD THIS ON VISCA

Build your application.
Choose your workspace.

Build the interaction on Visca with shared identity, memory, tools, and permissions. Use Mellow as the ready-made workspace, free forever for personal use, or create your own interface. Choose local or connected services to fit the application.

Explore Mellow Illustrative product scenarios. Integration availability depends on your deployment.

THE AGENT CARRIES

Translate intent into bounded procedures

Coordinate machines and sensor feedback

Pause, recover, and document exceptions

ITS HUMAN DECIDES

Grant machine-specific authority

Confirm irreversible actions

Take over whenever conditions leave policy

ONE CONTINUING ASSIGNMENT

A day in the work.

06:55Agent

Inspect readiness

Compare the task with machine state, maintenance, tools, and constraints.

01
07:04Human

Release the job

Approve the physical operation and its intervention boundary.

02
07:36Agent

Operate and observe

Coordinate execution while monitoring the signals that matter.

03
08:18Shared

Close the loop

Review the result, exception history, and next maintenance action.

04
AN ASSIGNMENT IN PRACTICE

Carry a workshop job through the exception, too.

A workshop wants to make a small fixture from an approved drawing. Preparation crosses design files, stock availability, equipment readiness, job notes, and an operator’s review. This scenario shows how an agent workplace could keep those pieces together while any physical operation stays within the equipment’s established operating procedures.

Illustrative product scenario. These are proposed experience requirements, not a customer case study or a statement of current integration availability.

What goes into the assignment.

Provide the drawing revision, intended material, acceptance criteria, permitted equipment, and the person responsible for releasing the job. The agent could organize the job packet, compare requested materials with available records, and identify questions for the operator. It should make the planned operation and its assumptions inspectable before requesting authority to affect a machine.

What a useful outcome contains.

A completed assignment includes the approved job packet, the operation record available from the equipment, any operator interventions, and the result of the agreed inspection. If the fixture fails an acceptance check, the outcome is a documented exception with a proposed next step. Producing a part is not the same as producing an accepted part, and a completed command is not evidence of either.

At the workstation, show what matters now.

A screen beside the machine could focus on the current job, confirmed state, and the next operator decision. Away from the workshop, a status update can say that the job needs attention and why. The experience should distinguish viewing a job remotely from having authority to operate equipment; arriving near a machine should not automatically expand that authority either.

No blind replay after a lost connection.

If acknowledgement of a command is missing, the agent should show that the result is unknown rather than assume the command failed. The operator needs to establish the actual machine and workpiece state before considering another action. Retain the original request, last confirmed feedback, and recovery decision so a repeated command cannot be mistaken for the first attempt.

The workplace is not the machine’s safety system.

Begin with job preparation and review, then evaluate any proposed equipment connection separately. Visca’s product scenario does not replace machine controls, guarding, operating procedures, or the operator’s responsibilities. The relevant question is whether the particular integration can make authority, actual state, intervention, and completion clear enough for the intended job, not whether an agent can issue a command.

START WITH A REAL ASSIGNMENT

What would make this useful for you?

Use these questions to evaluate one bounded piece of work in your own setting.

  1. Can the operator inspect exactly which drawing, material, equipment, and operation an approval covers?
  2. After interrupted communication, is an unknown outcome clearly different from a failed or completed operation?
  3. Does closing the assignment require the agreed inspection result, including any rejected or unfinished work?
Discuss your first assignment
A person working with instruments at a laboratory bench

WHY CONTINUITY MATTERS

A machine is a governed capability of the agent, not a second identity, a disconnected console, or a record that disappears after the run.

NEXT FIELD · PHYSICAL EMBODIMENT

Give physical agents a human interface.